To request a blog written on a specific topic, please email James@StatisticsSolutions.com with your suggestion. Thank you!
Showing posts with label multiple linear regression. Show all posts
Showing posts with label multiple linear regression. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 30, 2013

Table and Symbols in a Logistic Regression




Source
B
SE B
Wald χ2
p
OR
95% CI OR







Variable 1
1.46
0.12
7.55
.006
4.31
[3.26, 5.35]
Variable 2
-0.43
0.15
6.31
.012
0.65
[0.18, 0.83]
Note. OR = odds ratio. CI = confidence interval

The table for a typical logistic regression is shown above.  There are six sets of symbols used in the table (B, SE B, Wald χ2, p, OR, 95% CI OR).  The main variables interpreted from the table are the p and the OR.  However, it can be useful to know what each variable means.

B – This is the unstandardized regression weight. It is measured just a multiple linear regression weight and can be simplified in its interpretation. For example, as Variable 1 increases, the likelihood of scoring a “1” on the dependent variable also increases.  As Variable 2 increases, the likelihood of scoring a “1” on the dependent variable decreases.

SE B – Like the multiple linear regression, this is how much the unstandardized regression weight can vary by. It is similar to a standard deviation to a mean.

Wald χ2 – This is the test statistic for the individual predictor variable.  A multiple linear regression will have a t test, while a logistic regression will have a χ2 test.  This is used to determine the p value.

p – this is used to determine which variables are significant.  Typically, any variable that has a p value below .050 would be significant.  In the table above, Variable 1 and Variable 2 are significant.

OR – this is the odds ratio.  This is the measurement of likelihood.  For every one unit increase in Variable 1, the odds of a participant having a “1” in the dependent variable increases by a factor of 4.31.  However, for Variable 2, this doesn’t make a lot of sense (for every one unit increase in Variable 2, the odds of a participant having a “1” in the dependent variable increases by a factor of 0.65).  Any significant variable with a negative B value will be easier to interpret in the opposite manner.  Therefore for every one unit increase in Variable 2, the odds of a participant being a “0” in the dependent variable increases by a factor of (1 / 0.65) 1.54.  To interpret in the opposite direction, simply take one divided by that odds ratio.
95% CI OR – this is the 95% confidence interval for the odds ratio.  With these values, we are 95% certain that the true value of the odds ratio is between those units.  If the confidence interval does not contain a 1 in it, the p value will end up being less than .050.